- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Video-assisted radiofrequency ablation for pleural disseminated non-small cell lung cancer
© Shen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 28 July 2012
Accepted: 10 June 2013
Published: 13 June 2013
Clinically, some patients would have false-negative results in the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pleural dissemination, losing their chances of prolonged survival from surgery. Hence, this study aimed to clarify the benefit of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for NSCLC with malignant pleural dissemination that is detected during thoracoscopic lobectomy.
From July 2006, we started the application of RFA in combination with talc pleurodesis (R-TP) for pleural disseminated NSCLCs diagnosed by thoracoscopy. Patients who underwent TP alone (from December 30, 2005 to June 30, 2006) were retrospectively evaluated in compared with R-TP (from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2008). Clinical features were collected and compared to identify the difference in clinical outcomes between R-TP and TP alone. After discharge (three months after surgery), tumor response to treatment was assessed, and follow-up results were recorded to determine the perioperative and mid-time survival difference between the two groups.
In our study, the two groups were comparable in age, sex, performance status (PS) score, tumor location, and histological diagnosis. The incidence rate of intraoperative pleural dissemination was 5.98%, as diagnosed by video-assisted thoracoscopy. All the surgeries were completed without conversion to open thoracotomy. Except for the longer operation duration in the R-TP group (p < 0.001), there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of surgical features. Postoperatively, no mortality occurred in either group during hospital stay; however, two patients from the R-TP group developed complications (9.52%). The complete and partial remission rates in the R-TP group were 80% and 10%, respectively, and the stabilization rate was 10%. After the three-year follow-up, the overall survival (OS) rates of the R-TP and TP groups were 14.29% and 0%, respectively. The median survival and median tumor progression-free survival (PFS) periods were longer in the R-TP group than in the TP group (OS: 19 months versus 12.5 months, p = 0.045; PFS: 9.5 months versus 5.5 months, p = 0.028).
The introduction of RFA to TP offered survival benefits to pleural disseminated NSCLC patients, making it a potential alternative palliative treatment for local tumor. However, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.
Curative resection is the standard treatment for primary (stage I–IIIa) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) . However, some cases diagnosed as “early-stage” cancer before surgery are actually found to be pleural disseminated NSCLC during the operation. For patients with such cases, surgical resection is not the treatment of choice . However, the prognosis would remain poor even if the patient undergoes chemotherapy or radiotherapy instead, with a survival rate close to stage IIIa–IIIb cancer, as reported by Sawabata and colleagues . Traditionally, talc pleurodesis (TP) is performed for the control of pleural effusions associated with pleural disseminated NSCLCs . Although TP has been shown to be safe and effective, the prognoses of patients who undergo TP remain unchanged. Hence, new treatment strategies are required to improve the survival of patients with advanced-stage NSCLC.
Since first reported by Dupuy and colleagues, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been considered an alternative treatment of lung cancer  and shown to obtain remarkable outcomes especially in patients with early-stage cancer who could not tolerate standard surgery. In the current literature, the reported complete remission (CR) rate, as well as the median survival time from NSCLC patients underwent RFA were promising [6–9]. However, as for advanced lung cancers, whether RFA could obtain the same remarkable outcomes as it did for early-stage lesions remains unclear.
In this study, we hypothesized that RFA is beneficial to patients with pleural disseminated NSCLC. Therefore, we compared alternative (RFA combined with TP [R-TP]) and conservative therapies (TP alone) to determine whether R-TP would be technically safe and oncologically beneficial in the treatment of advance NSCLCs.
patients with clinical staged T1–T3N0M0 lung cancer;
patients without cancer history;
patients with no previous history of chest surgery;
patients with normal lung and heart function;
patients with an ASA score of I-III.
In case contraindications are found during thoracoscopic exploration, a conversion from radical to palliative surgery would be necessary. Conventionally, when pleural dissemination is verified during VATS, TP would then be performed. Since July 1, 2006, TP was substituted by R-TP at our institution. The exclusion criteria for R-TP included central tumors (within 3 cm of the hilum) and refusal to undergo R-TP. In this retrospective study, the clinical features and survival results of the R-TP group (from July 1, 2006, to June 30, 2008) were collected and compared with those of the TP group (from December 30, 2005 to June 30, 2006) to identify the difference between the two groups of patients.
Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients before undergoing R-TP. The ethics committee of Zhongshan hospital of Fudan university approved this research and granted a waiver for individual patient consent for those patients who were retrospectively evaluated.
All the patients underwent a combination of epidural and general anesthesia. During the operation, a double-lumen endotracheal tube was used to selectively deflate a single lung, with a continuous positive airway pressure of ten mmHg. The pleural tumor dissemination was verified by frozen sectioning. RFA was performed by using the RITA system(RITA Medical Systems Inc, USA). The deployment of the electrosurgical needle was staged according to the size of the tumor. Under thoracoscopic visual guidance, the probes were inserted 0.5 cm into the primary tumor, and multiple electrodes were deployed to two centimeters within the tumor (sequentially to three, four, and five centimeters). Thermal ablation was extended for 15 minutes after the tumor temperature reached 90°C. In the case of a large tumor (diameter longer than three centimeters), multiple repositioning and reablation at different sites within the tumor were required to ensure ablation of the entire lesion. Then six–eight grams of sterilized talc powder was sprayed into the pleural cavity. With a chest tube for drainage, the surgery concluded with closure of the incisions in layers. In TP, when the pathologists concurred on the diagnosis of pleural dissemination, the procedure was to spray six–eight grams of talcum powder into the pleural cavity and close the incision, using a chest tube for drainage.
Postoperatively, all the patients were followed up until December 2010 by CT scans, abdominal type-B ultrasonic examination, and brain MRI inspection every three months. An isotopic bone scan was obtained every six months. Tumor response to treatment was assessed three months after surgery, according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.
Data collection and statistical analysis
The clinical data including patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical features, and clinical outcomes of both groups were collected from the clinical database of the Thoracic Division of the Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
The information described earlier was recorded in Excel for further processing. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software (version 17.0), using the t test and chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
61.5 ± 3.2
59.7 ± 4.4
Tumor diameter (cm)
3.13 ± 1.01
2.80 ± 0.86
Surgery duration (min)
Blood loss (mL)
Duration of drainage (days)
Total drainage amount (mL)
Length of stay (days)
In the R-TP group, 20 patients survived for three months after the surgery and one patient died owing to systemic infection after chemotherapy. The CT scans showed that 16 patients (80%) had complete remission, two (10%) had partial remission, and two (10%) remained stable. The total effective rate (CR + PR) was 90%.
After the three-year follow-up, tumor progression occurred in 19 patients in the R-TP group, including six brain metastasis, five bone metastasis, one contralateral lung metastasis, one mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and six local recurrences. The tumor progression rates at years one, two, and three were 61.90%, 85.71%, and 90.48% respectively.
Concerning patients with early-stage NSCLC, surgical resection is the standard treatment. Some large-sample studies showed reasonable outcomes of lobectomy or pneumonectomy for selected patients with early-stage NSCLC . Unfortunately, in cases of pleural dissemination, found via operation, surgery is not preferred and radiotherapy or chemotherapy is not effective either. Given that pleural dissemination has been associated with poor prognosis, it was upstaged to M1a in the seventh edition of the TNM staging classification . Watanabe et al.  reported that more than half of all patients who underwent exploratory thoracotomy were found to have pleural dissemination. Hence, preventing pleural dissemination remains a challenge for surgeons.
Since Dupuy et al.  first reported RFA for the treatment of lung cancer in 2000, it has been shown to obtain positive outcomes, encouraging more studies on its application for lung cancer patients . Previously, the RAPTURE study reported the application of percutaneous RFA in inoperable early-stage lung cancer; the one- and two-year survival rates of the patients were 92% and 73%, respectively , which were close to the values obtained by surgical resection. Indeed, RFA is an alternative treatment for patients with early-stage cancer who are inoperable. Based on these findings, we explored its further application in advanced lung cancer.
In our study, the overall survival rates at years one, two, and three were 80.95%, 28.57%, and 14.29%, respectively, and the tumor progression-free and overall survival rates were higher in the R-TP group, indicating a better prognosis than that of the patients who underwent TP only. Moreover, the application of RFA in combination with TP did not increase the risks of perioperative morbidity and mortality according to our data. Therefore, the combined R-TP treatment of pleural disseminated NSCLC does not increase the risks of higher morbidity.
According to the review by Zhu et al. , the complete tumor control rates by RFA ranged from 38–97%. Simon et al.  reported that the results were poorer in lesions that measured ≥ three centimeters. The total effective rate was 90% in the R-TP group in our research. The relatively high CR rate was realized using VATS, which allowed precise tumor localization without interference from respiration and damage caused by puncture needles. As for large tumors, multiple repositioning of the needle in different sites within the tumor was required to ensure complete ablation of the lesion.
It was concluded that NSCLC patients with malignant pleural diffusion would not benefit from tumor resection . However, NSCLC patients who underwent partial resection combined with parietal pleurectomy or intrathoracic hyperthermo-chemotherapy [16–18] had good prognosis. The application of the combined treatment modality is restricted to operable patients. In contrast, video-assisted RFA can be applied more widely and preserves normal lung tissue maximally . Goldberg et al.  used an animal model to demonstrate that normal lung tissue rapidly heals from thermal injury. Thus, for NSCLC patients with pleural dissemination, especially those with poor lung function, video-assisted RFA combined with pleurodesis is a potential alternative treatment that yields more benefits in a single surgical setting.
In our experience, when a tumor is close to large vessels, the blood may absorb a great amount of heat and impair the effectiveness of RFA. In case the lesion is close to the hilum, RFA may cause complications such as bronchopleural fistula. In these conditions, RFA is not recommended, but rather refined techniques are required to overcome these difficulties.
The common complications of CT-guided percutaneous RFA include pneumothorax and pleural effusion (range, 15.2%–55.6%), which were usually self-limiting. Approximately 3.3–38.9% of the patients required chest tube insertion for drainage [15, 21]. In our study, only two complications (9.52%) occurred in the R-TP group. Although the study was based on small population, the relatively low incidence of complication suggested that thoracoscopic guidance could be considered as a safe and easy alternative to conventional therapy. The electrode tract bleeding was controlled by increasing the output power of the RITA system for electric coagulation homeostasis; in case of small branches of pulmonary artery bleeding, we used carbasus to stanch the blood. These manipulations decreased the risk of complications caused by percutaneous RFA such as pneumothorax and hemothorax. Our study showed that the perioperative characteristics did not differ between the R-TP and TP groups. One patient had pneumonia, and another complained of emptysis after surgery due to the large tumor near the central airway. The latter was eventually cured with hemostasis. Furthermore, thoracoscopic RFA did not increase the surgery-related risk and the period of postoperative hospital stay.
In summary, this study evaluated 45 consecutive patients with pleural disseminated NSCLC. The perioperative and long-term follow-up results verified that the video-assisted RFA was a safe, feasible, and effective treatment for selected NSCLC patients with pleural dissemination, as well as an alternative palliative treatment for local tumor. However, further prospective studies on the role of RFA in the multimodality treatment for inoperable patients are necessary.
Dr Yaxing Shen1 and Dr Ming Zhong2 is the co-first author.
- Yamamoto K, Ohsumi A, Kojima F, Imanishi N, Matsuoka K, Ueda M, Miyamoto Y: Long-term survival after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for primary lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010, 89: 353-359. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.10.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morgensztern D, Waqar S, Subramanian J, Trinkaus K, Govindan R: Prognostic impact of malignant pleural effusion at presentation in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012, 7: 1485-1489. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318267223a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sawabata N, Matsumura A, Motohiro A, Osaka Y, Gennga K, Fukai S, Mori T: Malignant minor pleural effusion detected on thoracotomy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: is tumor resection beneficial for prognosis?. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002, 73: 412-415. 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03426-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Basso SM, Mazza F, Marzano B, Santeufemia DA, Chiara GB, Lumachi F: Improved quality of life in patients with malignant pleural effusion following video assisted thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis. Preliminary results. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32: 5131-5134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dupuy DE, Zagoria RJ, Akerley W, Mayo-Smith WW, Kavanagh PV, Safran H: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of malignancies in the lung. Am J Roentgenol. 2000, 174: 57-59. 10.2214/ajr.174.1.1740057.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Crabtree T, Puri V, Timmerman R, Fernando H, Bradley J, Decker PA, Paulus R, Putnum JB, Dupuy DE, Meyers B: Treatment of stage I lung cancer in high-risk and inoperable patients: comparison of prospective clinical trials using stereotactic body radiotherapy (RTOG 0236), sublobar resection (ACOSOG Z4032), and radiofrequency ablation (ACOSOG Z4033). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013, 145: 692-699. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.10.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lanuti M, Sharma A, Willers H, Digumarthy SR, Mathisen DJ, Shepard JA: Radiofrequency ablation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: management of locoregional recurrence. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012, 93: 921-927. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.11.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zemlyak A, Moore WH, Bilfinger TV: Comparison of survival after sublobar resections and ablative therapies for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2010, 211: 68-72. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ambrogi MC, Fanucchi O, Cioni R, Dini P, De Liperi A, Cappelli C, Davini F, Bartolozzi C, Mussi A: Long-term results of radiofrequency ablation treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective intention-to-treat study. J Thorac Oncol. 2011, 6: 2044-2051. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31822d538d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, Lee PC, Harpole DH, Onaitis MW, Stiles BM, Port JL, D’Amico TA: Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010, 139: 366-378. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chansky K, Sculier JP, Crowley JJ, Giroux D, Van Meerbeeck J, Goldstraw P: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project: prognostic factors and pathologic TNM stage in surgically managed non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009, 4: 792-801. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a7716e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe S, Asamura H, Suzuki K, Tsuchiya R: Problems in diagnosis and surgical management of clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005, 79: 1682-1685. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.11.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simon CJ, Dupuy DE, DiPetrillo TA, Safran HP, Grieco CA, Ng T, Mayo-Smith WW: Pulmonary radiofrequency ablation: long-term safety and efficacy in 153 patients. Radiology. 2007, 243: 268-275. 10.1148/radiol.2431060088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lencioni R, Crocetti L, Cioni R, Suh R, Glenn D, Regge D, Helmberger T, Gillams AR, Frilling A, Ambrogi M, Bartolozzi C, Mussi A: Response to radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary tumours: a prospective, intention-to-treat, multicentre clinical trial (the RAPTURE study). Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9: 621-628. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70155-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhu JC, Yan TD, Morris DL: A systematic review of radiofrequency ablation for lung tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008, 15: 1765-74. 10.1245/s10434-008-9848-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SR, Han HJ, Park SJ, Min KH, Lee MH, Chung CR, Kim MH, Jin GY, Lee YC: Comparison between surgery and radiofrequency ablation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2012, 81: 395-399. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.091.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schneider T, Reuss D, Warth A, Schnabel PA, von Deimling A, Herth FJ, Dienemann H, Hoffmann H: The efficacy of bipolar and multipolar radiofrequency ablation of lung neoplasms-results of an ablate and resect study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011, 39: 968-973. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang L, Han Y, Zhao J, Wang X, Cheng Q, Li X, Xu H, Gao K: Is radiofrequency thermal ablation a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of pulmonary malignancies?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011, 39: 348-351. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.06.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donington J, Ferguson M, Mazzone P, Handy J, Schuchert M, Fernando H, Loo B, Lanuti M, de Hoyos A, Detterbeck F, Pennathur A, Howington J, Landreneau R, Silvestri G: American College of Chest Physicians and Society of Thoracic Surgeons consensus statement for evaluation and management for high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2012, 142: 1620-1635. 10.1378/chest.12-0790.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Compton CC, Mueller PR, McLoud TC: Radio-frequency tissue ablation of VX2 tumor nodules in the rabbit lung. Acad Radiol. 1996, 3: 929-935. 10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80303-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haasbeek CJ, Senan S, Smit EF, Paul MA, Slotman BJ, Lagerwaard FJ: Critical review of nonsurgical treatment options for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2008, 13: 309-319. 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://0-www.biomedcentral.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1471-2482/13/19/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.