Skip to main content

Brachial plexus injury after clavicle fracture operation: a case report and literature review

Abstract

Background

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the preferred choice for treating clavicle fractures. The brachial plexus injury caused by ORIF of a clavicle fracture is very rare. If it is not treated in time, the function of the brachial plexus will be challenging to recover, which will eventually lead to upper limb dysfunction and seriously affect the patient’s quality of life. Our team recently used ORIF to treat a patient with a clavicle fracture, who developed brachial plexus injury symptoms after surgery.

Case presentation

A 34-year-old female patient was admitted to the hospital for 13 h due to the right shoulder movement restriction after a fall. Due to the significant displacement of the fracture, we used ORIF to treat the fracture. The surgery went well. When the anaesthesia effect subsided 12 h after the operation, the patient developed right brachial plexus injury symptoms, decreased right upper limb muscle strength, dysfunction, and hypoesthesia. Symptomatic treatments, such as nourishing nerve and electrical stimulation, were given immediately. Sixty days after the operation, the patient’s brachial plexus injury symptoms disappeared, and the function of the right upper limb returned to the preoperative state.

Conclusions

Patients with clavicle fractures usually need to undergo a careful physical examination before surgery to determine whether symptoms of brachial plexus injury have occurred. Anaesthesia puncture requires ultrasound guidance to avoid direct damage to the brachial plexus. When the fracture end is sharp, reset should be careful to prevent nerve stump stabbed. When using an electric drill to drill holes, a depth limiter should be installed in advance to prevent the drill from damaging the subclavian nerve and blood vessels. When measuring the screw depth, the measuring instrument should be close to the bone surface and sink slowly to avoid intense hooks and damage to the brachial plexus. Try to avoid unipolar electrosurgical units to prevent heat conduction from damaging nerves, and bipolar electrocoagulation should be used instead. If symptoms of brachial plexus injury occur after surgery, initial symptomatic treatment is drugs and functional exercise, and if necessary, perform surgical exploration.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The shape of the clavicle is an S-shaped slender bone with a superficial position. It is prone to be fractured under the action of external forces. It accounts for 2–10% of all fractures in the body and 35% of scapular girdle fractures [1]. If not handled properly, it will often result in shoulder joint dysfunction. The most common cause of clavicle fractures is direct violence, such as car accident injuries, falls, sports injuries, etc; and can also be caused by indirect violence, such as the force of the palms on the ground when they fall [2, 3]. For fractures without apparent displacement, conservative treatment can often achieve good results, while for fractures with evident displacement, surgery is a better choice. ORIF is the preferred choice for treatment of clavicle fractures [4]. According to previous literature reports, some patients will experience complications such as fracture malunion, vascular injury, thoracic outlet syndrome, and pneumothorax, but brachial plexus injury is extremely rare [5,6,7,8]. Our team recently completed a case of a patient with a clavicle fracture, who developed symptoms of brachial plexus injury after surgery. The specific report is as follows:

Case presentation

A 34-year-old female patient was admitted to the hospital for 13 h due to the right shoulder movement restriction after a fall. The X-ray showed a fracture of the right clavicle (Fig. 1-A), with a significant displacement of the fracture end. After the fundamental assessment of the patient, we found that the patient’s upper limb nerve function is normal and can undergo the operation. So it was planned to use the clavicle anatomical plate (Waston Medical Corporation, China) for open reduction and internal fixation, following the standard operating procedure, using brachial plexus and cervical plexus anaesthesia, taking the fractured end as the center to make an 8 cm incision, and separating the tissue layer by layer. The fracture ends were severely comminuted, with the sharp distal and proximal ends. After carefully aligned the fracture ends with anatomical locking plates and screws, the fractures were well restored by radioscopy, and the wound is sutured after washing (Fig. 1-B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Preoperative orthotopic chest radiograph. B Postoperative orthographic shoulder joint radiograph

Twelve hours after the operation, the anesthetic effect subsided, and the patient complained of weakness in the right upper arm and forearm. Physical examination showed that the range of motion of the right elbow, right wrist joint, and right fingers was significantly reduced compared to the opposite side. The patient couldn’t extend the wrist (Fig. 2A), could extend the thumb (Fig. 2B), could flex the elbow (Fig. 2C). Muscle strength: right deltoid 2/5, right biceps 2/5, lateral extensor pollicis longus 2/5. The sensation of the right forearm and right hand was weaker than that of the contralateral side. Reports of brachial plexus injury caused by clavicle fracture surgery are rare but based on the patient’s symptoms, we consider the patient has incomplete brachial plexus injury. However, there is no indication for immediate surgical exploration because of the short occurrence time. Thus we gave supportive treatment: Oral methylcobalamin to nourish nerves (Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group Corporation), 0.5 mg/time, 3 times/day, and limb nerve electrical stimulation to promote functional recovery, 20 min/time, 2 times/day. On the 3rd and 7th day after the operation, the patient’s surgical incision healed well. The range of motion of the right elbow, right wrist joint, and right thumb and index finger recovered slightly, but the range of motion of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th fingers of the right hand remained unchanged. There was no significant improvement in the muscle strength of the right deltoid, biceps, and right extensor pollicis longus.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Inability to extend the wrist. B Inability to extend the thumb. C Inability to flex the elbow

After being discharged from the hospital, the patient was asked to continue rehabilitation exercises and nutritional nerve treatment; and was followed every 2 weeks to 60 days after surgery. The motor function of the patient’s right upper limb recovered well. Abduction and adduction of shoulder and fingers, flexion and extension of wrist and elbow were normal (Fig. 3). Muscle strength: right upper limb completely restored, right deltoid 5/5, right biceps 5/5, right extensor pollicis longus 5/5. The sensation of the right forearm and right hand shows no abnormality compared to the opposite side.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A Shoulder abduction. B Abduction and adduction of the fingers. C Wrist extension. D Elbow flexion

Discussion and conclusions

The brachial plexus is an important peripheral nerve plexus in the human body. It is composed of C5–C8, T1 nerve roots, and innervates the sensory and motor functions of the shoulder and upper limbs [9]. Once injured, the disability rate is high, which seriously affects the quality of life of patients. There are two most common causes of clavicle bone fracture with brachial plexus injury: one is in newborns with the injury caused by the traction of the newborn’s upper limb during the delivery; the other is in adults with the injury caused by traffic accidents, falling from heights, etc [10, 11]. The symptoms caused by puncturing a nerve at the fracture’s broken end often appear immediately after the injury [12]. According to previous reports, the probability of brachial plexus injury caused by clavicle fracture surgery is extremely rare.

The patient had no apparent symptoms of brachial plexus injury immediately after the injury. The surgical procedures are gentle overall. There are no procedures that result in hyperextension of the shoulder, hyperabduction of the upper limb. When surgery is completed, we give the careful hemostasis, and there is no active bleeding forming a partial hematoma which may compress the nerves. However, after the anesthesia wears off, the patient developed symptoms of brachial plexus injury, mainly manifested as loss of shoulder elevation due to deltoid muscle dysfunction innervated by axillary nerve, loss of elbow flexion due to biceps muscle dysfunction innervated by musculocutaneous nerve, loss of the sensory and movement of the corresponding area of the radial nerve, median nerve and ulnar nerve. Analyzing the causes of brachial plexus injury, it is believed that there are the following possibilities: (1) Ultrasound navigation is not used during the anesthesia, and the puncture needle may directly puncture the brachial plexus based on experience; (2) The fracture ends are sharper, which may scratch the nerves during the reduction process; (3) There is variation in the brachial plexus, which are close to the fractured end. Heat conduction can cause nerve damage when using an electric knife to separate soft tissues. Clinically, the essential methods for early diagnosis of brachial plexus injury are electromyography examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which have the advantages of rapid, non-invasive, and high accuracy [13, 14]. Ultrasound is also an alternative examination method, but it has great requirements for the operator, which is not suitable for primary hospitals [15].

However, it is generally recommended to be performed electromyography examination 3 weeks later after the surgery, for the early soft tissue edema around the wound affects the diagnostic accuracy. On the second day after the operation, we diagnosed the brachial plexus injury according to the physical examination and make a detailed recovery plan. Methylcobalamin and electrical stimulation are commonly used methods in clinic and basic research area, which plays an important role in the treatment of nerve injury and degeneration. Zhang demonstrate that methylcobalamin has the ability to facilitate the recovery of motor and sensory function, and to promote myelination in peripheral nerve regeneration [16]. Willand think the imminent clinical applicability of acute brief low-frequency electrical stimulation effectively promote axonal regeneration and maximize functional recovery in diverse types of peripheral nerve injuries [17]. So we gave oral methylcobalamin to nourish the affected limb’s nerves and daily electrical stimulation to promote functional recovery. It is planned that if there is no improvement after 3 weeks, perform the electromyography. MRI is a very good way to diagnose brachial plexus injury. However, this patient had just undergone internal fixation of the fracture, and immediately improved MRI may lead to fracture displacement and internal fixation failure. If there is no relief after 3 months, we will perform MRI and surgical exploration. With regular patient’s follow-up after discharge, the symptoms gradually improved, and disappeared completely recovered to the preoperative state by 60 days after the operation, so we did not have an MRI examination on him.

Through this patient, we advise that patients with clavicle fractures maybe need to concern the following points for ORIF in order to avoid brachial plexus injury: (1) Careful physical examination is required before surgery to determine whether brachial plexus injury symptoms have occurred, if it appears, we need to exploration of nerve during operation. (2) Using ultrasound-guided needle puncture as much as possible during the anesthesia puncture process to avoid direct damage to the brachial plexus. (3) When relatively sharp fracture fragments, the reduction maybe careful to prevent puncturing local nerve ends. (4) When using an electric drill, it is better to install a depth limiter in advance. It is generally safer to limit it to within 1.8 cm to prevent the drill from damaging the subclavian nerve and blood vessels. (5) When measuring the depth of the screw, the measuring instrument against the bone surface and sink slowly to avoid snagging brachial plexus, while gently inserted under the clavicle bone aside for added protection. (6) Try to avoid using a single-stage electric knife, in order to avoid heat conduction nerve damage. In particular, those whom some patients may have anatomic variation close to the fracture. Bipolar coagulation is recommended. (7) If the patient develops brachial plexus injury symptoms after surgery, the preferred supportive treatments are drugs and rehabilitation training such as electrical stimulation. Suppose the symptoms are not significantly relieved until 3 weeks after surgery. In that case, it is advised to perform the electromyography to identify the specific injury part, and if the nerve function still does not recover until 3 months after the operation, we need do MRI and surgical exploration is recommended.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ORIF:

Open reduction and plate internal fixation

References

  1. Park JS, Ko SH, Hong TH, et al. Plate fixation versus titanium elastic nailing in midshaft clavicle fractures based on fracture classifications. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020;28(3):2309499020972204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shih JT, Wu CC, Wang CC, et al. Midshaft clavicle fracture following osteosynthesis with a hook plate: a retrospective case analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(11):1713–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kihlstrom C, Moller M, Lonn K, Wolf O. Clavicle fractures: epidemiology, classification and treatment of 2 422 fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register; an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell DH, McKee MD. Operative fixation of a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2020;34(Suppl 2):S3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Putnam M, Vanderkarr M, Nandwani P, Holy CE, Chitnis AS. Surgical treatment, complications, and reimbursement among patients with clavicle fracture and acromioclavicular dislocations: a US retrospective claims database analysis. J Med Econ. 2019;22(9):901–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Demir D, Borger van der Burg B, Stollenwerck G, Hoencamp R. Subclavian artery occlusion after a clavicle fracture. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12(11):e229314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gieger J, Beeres F, Birrer K, Babst R. Misalignment of the clavicle after intramedullary fixation of a midshaft fracture with a titanium elastic nail results in acute neurovascular thoracic outlet syndrome. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25(4):e110-114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim MK, Lee HJ, You AH, Kang HY. Pneumothorax after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for midshaft clavicle fracture: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(33):e16836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feigl GC, Litz RJ, Marhofer P. Anatomy of the brachial plexus and its implications for daily clinical practice: regional anesthesia is applied anatomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020;45(8):620–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi HA, Lee YK, Ko SY, Shin SM. Neonatal clavicle fracture in cesarean delivery: incidence and risk factors. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(14):1689–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rathore S, Kasha S, Yeggana S. Fracture dislocation of shoulder with brachial plexus palsy: a case report and review of management options. J Orthop Case Rep. 2017;7(2):48–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Clitherow HD, Bain GI. Major neurovascular complications of clavicle fracture surgery. Shoulder Elb. 2015;7(1):3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jovanovich EN, Howard JF Jr. Brachial plexus injury in a 6-year-old boy with 100% displaced proximal humeral metaphyseal fracture: a case presentation. PM R. 2017;9(12):1294–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Acharya AM, Cherian BS, Bhat AK. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for traumatic adult brachial plexus injury: a comparison study with surgical findings. J Orthop. 2020;17:53–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar AH, Kim J, Sadeghi N, Leversedge FJ, Moorman CT, Grant SA. The use of ultrasound imaging for brachial plexus injury assessment following operative clavicle repair. Can J Anesth. 2018;65(6):739–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang D, Yang W, Wang C, et al. Methylcobalamin-loaded PLCL conduits facilitate the peripheral nerve regeneration. Macromol Biosci. 2020;20(3):e1900382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Willand MP, Nguyen MA, Borschel GH, Gordon T. Electrical stimulation to promote peripheral nerve regeneration. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30(5):490–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Department of operating room of the first Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University for their support and help during the whole process.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to this article. ZYC and YFH prepared and write the manuscript. XCS and MHT processed image and done text proofreading. ML and WCJ supervised the study and operated the operation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenchen Ji or Meng Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This is a case report and technical precautions. It has been approved by the hospital before surgery.

Consent for publication

We obtained written consent from the parents of the participants before publishing this information.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, Z., Hou, Y., Su, X. et al. Brachial plexus injury after clavicle fracture operation: a case report and literature review. BMC Surg 21, 337 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12893-021-01335-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12893-021-01335-8

Keywords