Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of burst pressure for bipolar electrocoagulation under different powers

From: Thermal damage width and hemostatic effect of bipolar electrocoagulation, LigaSure, and Ultracision techniques on goat mesenteric vessels and optimal power for bipolar electrocoagulation

Group

burst pressure (mmHg)

P value

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

80 W

660.267 ± 38.596

–

1.000

1.000

0.057

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

75 W

645.200 ± 36.096

1.000

–

1.000

0.548

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

70 W

637.000 ± 42.559

1.000

1.000

–

1.000

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

65 W

609.867 ± 30.854

0.057

0.548

1.000

–

0.004

0.001

< 0.001

60 W

553.567 ± 37.058

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.004

–

1.000

0.935

55 W

546.567 ± 34.834

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.001

1.000

–

1.000

50 W

518.533 ± 25.322

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.935

1.000

–

  1. χ2 = 147.204, P < 0.001
Back to article page

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us