Skip to main content
Download PDF

Usefulness of serum sodium levels as a novel marker for predicting acute appendicitis severity: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Surgery volume 23, Article number: 312 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Early and accurate preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis mandates the identification of new markers. The aim of this study is to determine whether preoperative serum sodium levels are useful for predicting the severity of acute appendicitis.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 475 patients who underwent emergency appendectomies between January 2018 and February 2023 in a general hospital in Brazil. The patients were divided into 2 groups: complicated (n = 254) and uncomplicated (n = 221). Hyponatremia was defined as serum sodium levels < 136 mEq/L. The primary outcome was to evaluate if hyponatremia is associated with complicated appendicitis.

Results

The patients had a median age of 22 years, and the median serum sodium level was 137 mEq/L in patients with complicated appendicitis and 139 mEq/L in uncomplicated appendicitis (P < 0.001). The analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve used as the best cutoff value of serum sodium of 136 mEq/L with a sensitivity of 45.7%, specificity of 86.4%, positive predictive value of 79.5%, and negative predictive value of 58.1% for the diagnosis of complicated AA. Of the 254 patients with complicated appendicitis, 84 (33.1%) had serum sodium levels below 136 mEq/L, while only 12 (5.4%) patients with uncomplicated appendicitis had values ​​below this cutoff. Patients with hyponatremia were 5 times more likely to develop complicated appendicitis. (odds ratio: 5.35; 95% confidence interval: 3.39–8.45)

Conclusions

Preoperative serum sodium levels are a useful tool for predicting the severity of acute appendicitis. Due to its low cost and wide availability, it has become an extremely relevant marker.

Peer Review reports

Background

Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the leading causes of acute abdominal pain in the emergency room. It has a lifetime prevalence of 7–9% and mainly affects young males. Although its signs and symptoms are common, its diagnosis can be challenging [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, it has non-negligible morbidity and mortality rates (10% and 1–5%, respectively) [1, 2].

The clinical history and physical examination are the cornerstones in the diagnosis of AA [2, 3]. However, even among experienced surgeons, the diagnostic specificity is approximately 85% [3]. The scores used for AA were developed to improve this diagnosis and have been used routinely to stratify the risk of AA. The best-known scores are the Alvarado, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA), and Adult Appendicitis Scores (AAS) [2, 4, 5]. Although their sensitivity and specificity range between 60 and 90%, none of these scoring systems assess the risk of complications, perforation, or severity [6].

The current consensus does not adequately indicate how to differentiate complicated from uncomplicated AA in the preoperative period. Computed tomography (CT) is the most widely used method for this purpose [2, 7, 8]. However, this examination presents the risk of exposure to ionizing radiation and is unavailable in many emergency departments. The same consensus established that patients with complicated cases should be treated as urgently as possible, while initial cases can be treated with antibiotics alone [2, 3, 8,9,10]. Therefore, the stratification of this disease into complicated and uncomplicated cases has become increasingly relevant [3, 7, 8].

Based on these limitations, it is imperative to investigate new diagnostic tools, particularly for suspected severe cases. Serum sodium measurement has gained prominence because of its low cost and wide availability. Recent studies have investigated the role of hyponatremia in complicated appendicitis, especially in children [5, 10,11,12,13]. Hyponatremia was initially associated with mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis. Still, its utility in other diseases, such as gangrenous cholecystitis, intestinal ischemia, colonic perforation, and intestinal fistulae, has recently been established. The pathogenesis of hyponatremia is associated with pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin 1 beta. These interleukins are released during intra-abdominal inflammation, which leads to an increase in circulating vasopressin levels and subsequent sodium dilution [4,5,6, 9, 14].

The present study aimed to determine whether preoperative serum sodium level may be a predictive marker of severity in patients with acute appendicitis.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 475 patients who underwent appendectomies at the General Hospital of Carapicuíba (Brazil, São Paulo) between January 2018 and February 2023. This study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of São Camilo University Center (CAAE number: 68182223.2.0000.0062). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. Data were extracted from electronic medical records, including demographic data (age and sex), intraoperative findings, histopathological examinations, and serum sodium levels on admission. Patients who had undergone other concomitant surgeries and those who were not diagnosed with acute appendicitis were excluded. Patients were divided into 2 groups: complicated (n = 254) and uncomplicated (n = 221) AA (Table 1). Cases of necrosis, perforation, regional peritonitis, diffuse peritonitis, and abscesses were considered complicated. A serum sodium level < 136 mEq/l was considered the optimal cutoff point for hyponatremia. Serum sodium levels were measured using the ion-selective electrode method with an Architect Plus C4000 analyzer (Abbott, Lake Bluff, IL, USA).

Categorical variables are presented as percentages and frequencies, and qualitative variables are presented as medians, and interquartile ranges. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to define normality, whereas the Mann-Whitney U test was used for bivariate comparisons. We used one proportion Z test to analyze the distribution of qualitative factors, analyzing the distribution of relative frequencies (percentages or prevalence). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of gender, serum sodium level and age with complicated appendicitis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, and sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 software (IBM Statistics, Armonk, NY, IBM Corp.), and P < 0.05 was used as the significance level.

Results

During the study period, 475 appendectomies were performed, of which 254 (53.5%) were complicated and 221 (46.5%) were uncomplicated (Table 1). AA was more frequent in males (62.3%) (Table 1). The patients had a median age of 22 years and interquartile range (13–34) (Table 1). The median serum sodium level was 137 mEq/L in patients with complicated appendicitis and 139 mEq/L in uncomplicated patients (P < 0.001) (Table 2). The serum sodium level showed no difference between both sexes, with females and males having the same median value in complicated cases (137 mEq/L) (Table 2).

Table 1 Descriptive analysis of clinical-demographic variables
Full size table

The ROC curve analysis used a serum sodium level of 136 mEq/L as the optimal cutoff point, with a sensitivity of 45.7%, specificity of 86.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 79.5%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 58.1%, and AUC of 0.696 (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1). Of the 254 patients with complicated appendicitis, 84 (33.1%) had serum sodium levels below 136 mEq/L, whereas only 12 (5.4%) patients with uncomplicated appendicitis had values below this cutoff value.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Analysis of the receptor operating characteristic (ROC) curve of serum sodium in patients with complicated acute appendicitis (area under the curve 0.696; P < 0.001)

Full size image
Table 2 Comparison of serum sodium for the type of acute appendicitis
Full size table

The variables (serum sodium, age and gender) were included in a multivariate logistic analysis, which revealed that age (odds ratio: 1,02, 95% CI: 1,01–1,03) and low serum sodium (odds ratio: 0,74, 95% CI: 0,68 − 0,80) levels correlated with the risk of complicated appendicitis. (Table 3). These variables are independent risk factors for complicated appendicitis. Detailed information about multivariate analysis is summarized in Table 3.

Table 3 Multivariate logistic model for acute appendicitis
Full size table

Discussion

Acute appendicitis is one of the main causes of urgent abdominal surgery worldwide [1, 2, 4,5,6, 15, 16]. Although early diagnosis increases the therapeutic success rate, the incidence of perforation can reach up to 40% of cases diagnosed late. Appendiceal perforation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and mainly affects extremes of age. The evolution of AA into perforation is considered inevitable; however, this dogma is no longer accepted. Recent evidence suggests that the resolution of the condition may be a frequent event [1, 11]. However, acute perforated and non-perforated appendicitis appears to be different disease entities, and perforation occurs more frequently in patients with an impaired inflammatory response [17, 18]. Due to this variability in presentation and evolution, it is pertinent to distinguish preoperatively between complicated and uncomplicated cases [17].

AA can be classified as complicated or uncomplicated based on histopathological findings and classification systems for intraoperative findings [2, 19]. Complicated acute appendicitis occurs when the appendix becomes gangrene or perforates, leading to abscess formation and fecal or purulent peritonitis [4, 5]. The classification by Gomes et al. is a grading system based on intraoperative findings. This system subdivides AA into 5 grades: patients with grades 1 and 2 appendicitis are considered uncomplicated (hyperemia and fibrinous exudate), and those with grades 3, 4, and 5 (3 A, segmental necrosis; 3 B, necrosis of the base of the appendix; 4 A, localized abscess; 4 B, regional peritonitis; and 5, diffuse peritonitis) are considered complicated [19].

Complicated cases are associated with worse clinical outcomes, longer lengths of stay, high hospital costs, poor quality of life, and high complication rates [4, 6, 12, 13]. Early identification of complications seems to have implications for decision-making, especially regarding the appropriate time for surgical intervention. Identifying preoperative diagnostic tools that predict disease severity and aid in decision-making is critical; they may be important in appropriately allocating resources to patients with potentially complicated diseases [14, 15, 20].

Various markers have been used to stratify AA severity. Among these, the most commonly used are C-reactive protein levels (CRP), white blood cell, bilirubin levels, liver inflammatory activity tests (alanine transaminase [ALT] and aspartate aminotransferase [AST]), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and serum sodium levels. The study conducted by Akbulut et al. showed that white blood cell > 10.900, total bilirubin > 0.61 and CRP > 0.725 were considered independent risk factors for predicting complicated AA. Farooqui et al. reported that patients with perforated appendicitis had significantly higher levels of white blood cell (P = 0.004), bilirubin (P < 0.001) and CRP (P < 0.001) than patients with a non-perforated appendicitis. A systematic review by Hajibandeh et al. identified that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 8.8 was a predictor of complicated appendicitis (sensitivity of 76.92% and specificity 100% with AUC of 0.91). We identified in our study that serum sodium level < 136 mEq/L has a sensitivity of 45.7% and specificity of 86.4% with AUC: 0.696 to diagnose complicated AA (P < 0.001), results very similar to other markers. Recent studies have also associated the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning to predict severity in AA with high levels of accuracy [4,5,6, 16, 21,22,23].

Hyponatremia has already been described in other etiologies, such as pneumonia, meningitis, and encephalitis, in which inflammation with or without infection plays a central role. In most diseases, the decrease in serum sodium levels is due to the nonosmotic secretion of vasopressin (ADH). It is becoming increasingly clear that the immunoendocrine interface can release vasopressin directly into circulation. Despite being multifactorial, the current evidence demonstrates the key role of IL-6 in ADH release. The supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei and the subfornical organ are the brain areas involved in this control, translating the osmolarity-control signal. This non-osmotic release of ADH causes reabsorption of excess free water in the kidneys, leading to dilutional hyponatremia [5, 17, 24, 25].

The association between hyponatremia and appendicitis has been investigated more extensively in the pediatric population [26]. The systematic reviews by Gianis et al. and Anand et al. showed similar results regarding the presence of hyponatremia in children with complicated AA. The results were statistically significant in favor of complicated cases. However, only a few papers were included in the reviews, which still shows the paucity of influential articles on the subject [5, 10]. Zhan et al. evaluated children with acute appendicitis and found that patients with complicated diseases had significantly lower serum sodium levels, with a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 68%, and an AUC of 0.78.

Pogorolec et al., in their prospective study of 184 children, reported that the mean serum sodium of patients with complicated appendicitis was 132.2 mmol/L and 139.2 mmol/L in patients with uncomplicated appendicitis (P < 0.001). A sodium value < 135 mmol/L was used as the best possible cut-off point, with a sensitivity of 94.7%, specificity of 88.5%, AUC of 0.983, and P < 0.001 [12]. Meanwhile, in their evaluation of 1283 children under 15 years of age, Walsh et al. considered 135 mEq/L as the cut-off point for hyponatremia and detected hyponatremia in 31.4% of the complicated cases and only 3.8% of the uncomplicated cases (P < 0.0001) [27].

Kim et al. evaluated 1550 adult patients who underwent appendectomies. Of the 409 patients with complicated AA, 173 (42.3%) had serum sodium levels of < 135 mEq/L. This same study evaluated that patients with hyponatremia are almost 3 times more likely to have perforated or gangrenous appendicitis [20]. Our study identified that patients with hyponatremia were 5 times more likely to have complicated appendicitis. (odds ratio [OR]: 5.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.39–8.45). In a study by Turhan et al. evaluating more than 700 patients, including adults and children, 137.5 mEq/l was used as the cut-off point. This value had a sensitivity of 63%, a specificity of 66%, and an AUC of 0.67. (P < 0.0001) [14].

The study conducted by Symeonidis et al. in adult patients showed a sensitivity of 41.4% and specificity of 98.3% with a cutoff value of < 135 mEq/L for serum sodium. This study identified a PPV of 96.6% and an NPV of 60%. Hyponatremia was found in 41.2% of complicated patients and 1.6% of uncomplicated patients (P < 0.001) [26]. Our study identified a sensitivity of 45.7% and specificity of 86.4% with a cut-off value of 136 mEq/L (AUC: 0.696, P < 0.001). Hyponatremia was found in 33.1% of the patients with complicated AA, data very similar to those found by Pogorolec et al. and Kim et al. (31.4% and 42.3%, respectively).

A retrospective study by Sheen et al. on adult and minor patients identified significant findings only in the adult population. The authors reported that the risk in a patient with hyponatremia and complicated appendicitis was almost eight times higher. (OR: 7.915 95% CI: 2.7656–22.6521); P < 0.0001 [17]. Ozdemir et al. retrospectively analyzed 772 adult patients who underwent an emergency appendectomy. A sensitivity of 27.8% and specificity of 92.1% were identified with a cutoff value of 133.5 mEq/L and an AUC of 0.612 (95% CI: 0.539–0.684). The same authors found that patients with hyponatremia (sodium ≤ 134 mEq/L) were 3 times more likely to have complicated AA [28].

Clinical trials, systematic reviews, and consensus statements (World Society of Emergency Surgery and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma) include non-surgical treatment of AA in their recommendations [2, 7, 8, 29]. CODA (Comparison of Appendicectomy and Antibiotic Drugs) and APPAC TRIAL (Antibiotic Therapy vs. Appendicectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis) are relevant recent clinical trials on the non-surgical treatment of AA. These trials used computed tomography (CT) to select candidate patients for nonsurgical treatment [7, 8]. Studies have shown that patients selected by imaging exams for nonsurgical treatment may have an early failure (24–72 h) rate of 8–12% [29]. A recent meta-analysis of more than 4000 patients evaluated for complicated CT findings (extraluminal appendicitis, abscess, appendiceal wall defect, extraluminal air, ileus, perpendicular fluid collection, ascites, and intraluminal air) showed a pooled specificity greater than 70% (70–100%). However, the sensitivity was quite limited, ranging from 14 to 59% [30]. Another point worth mentioning is the lack of availability of imaging tests (CT) for diagnosing complicated AA in many emergency services and their high cost for countries with limited resources. Identifying a strong predictor of appendiceal perforation that is inexpensive and widely available, such as sodium, could guide the indication for the use of imaging methods and help in the selection of patients with radiologically confirmed AA who would be the best candidates for nonsurgical treatment [12, 25, 31]. The association of other serological markers, such as the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, increases the diagnostic and predictive value and could increase assertiveness in complicated cases [3,4,5,6, 32].

Few studies have investigated which parameters should be used to select the patients with the best chance of success with non-surgical treatment [29]. In the retrospective study by Loftus et al. with 81 patients, an appendix diameter < 13 mm was associated with a higher probability of success with conservative treatment [33]. In a randomized clinical trial, patients without appendicolith responded better to antibiotic therapy than those with appendicolith (41 vs. 25%, P < 0.05) [7]. However, another study evaluated the sensitivity and PPV to identify appendicolith on preoperative computed tomography. A sensitivity of 53.1% and PPV of 44.8% were identified, showing that tomography is not a reliable method for identifying appendicolith preoperatively [34]. Singh et al. evaluated 1014 appendectomies and identified that appendicolith was an incidental finding, and its prevalence was too low to be considered a cause of appendicitis. Appendicoliths were found in 18.1% of confirmed appendicitis cases and 28.6% of negative appendicitis cases. Chandrasegaram et al. evaluated more than 4000 patients who underwent appendectomy and identified the presence of appendicolith in only 3.9% of cases, and in the vast majority (60.5%), appendicolith was found in normal appendices [35]. Obstruction of the appendiceal lumen by a fecalith has been thought to lead to distension, bacterial growth, increased pressure, and progressive involvement with gangrene and appendiceal perforation [18]. Arnbjörnsson et al. evaluated the intraluminal pressure of 33 patients with AA. These authors identified an increase in luminal pressure in only 25% of these patients [36]. Flum et al. reported that appendiceal perforation is more associated with an altered inflammatory response than with an increase in intraluminal pressure due to obstruction [5, 18]. More than one mechanism is thought to be responsible for causing AA (obstruction, inflammatory response, microbiome, trauma, diet, constipation, and infection) [34]. Therefore, the use of markers such as sodium released by the inflammatory stimulus (IL-6) could help select patients for non-surgical treatment. These observations will help establish new selection criteria for patients who are candidates for non-surgical treatment of AA in future clinical trials.

In addition to being a predictive marker of severity in patients with AA, the preoperative measurement of serum sodium can potentially affect the management of patients who are candidates for conservative treatment and optimize decision-making in complicated cases [12, 26, 28].

The limitations of our study include its retrospective design, small sample size, data from a single institution, and discrepancies with the cutoff values used for hyponatremia in other studies, making a comparison between studies less reliable. An indirect limitation was not including negative appendectomies in the analysis due your small number of cases. Large-scale multicenter prospective studies are required to confirm our findings and extend them to clinical practice.

Conclusion

Thus, hyponatremia appears to be a promising marker for predicting the severity of acute appendicitis. The measurement of serum sodium levels < 136 mEq/L is an additional tool and may be indicative of complicated appendicitis. Due to its low cost and wide availability, it has become an extremely relevant marker.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AA:

Acute appendicitis

AAS:

Acute appendicitis score

ADH:

Vasopressin

AIR:

Appendicitis inflammatory response

ALT:

Alanine transaminase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

AUC:

Area under the curve

(B):

Logistic regression coefficient

CI:

Confidence interval

CODA:

Comparison of appendectomy and antibiotic drugs

CRP:

C-reactive protein

CT:

Computed tomography

SD:

Standard deviation

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

NPV:

Negative predictive value

OR:

Odds ratio

PPV:

Positive predictive value

Q1:

First quartile

Q3:

Third quartile

RIPASA:

Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

References

  1. Gomes CA, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, Ansaloni L, Catena F, Coccolini F, et al. Acute appendicitis: proposal of a new comprehensive grading system based on clinical, imaging and laparoscopic findings. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10:60. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13017-015-0053-2. PMID, PMCID: PMC4669630.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bom WJ, Scheijmans JCG, Salminen P, Boermeester MA. Diagnosis of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis in adults. Scand J Surg. 2021 June;110:170-9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/14574969211008330. Epub April 14 2021. PMID, PMCID: PMC8258714.

  4. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Hobbs N, Mansour M. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts acute appendicitis and distinguishes between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2020;219:154–63. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.04.018. Epub April 27 2019. PMID: 31056211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anand S, Krishnan N, Birley JR, Tintor G, Bajpai M, Pogorelić Z. Hyponatremia-A new diagnostic marker for complicated acute appendicitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child (Basel). 2022;9:1070–35884054. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children9071070. PMID, PMCID: PMC9321702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farooqui W, Pommergaard HC, Burcharth J, Eriksen JR. The diagnostic value of a panel of serological markers in acute appendicitis. Scand J Surg. 2015;104:72–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/1457496914529273. Epub April 15 2014. PMID: 24737847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordström P, Aarnio M, Rantanen T, et al. Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313:2340–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1001/jama.2015.6154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collaborative CODA, Flum DR, Davidson GH, Monsell SE, Shapiro NI, Odom SR et al. A randomized trial comparing antibiotics with appendectomy for appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2020 12;383:1907-19. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1056/NEJMoa2014320. Epub October 5 2020. PMID: 33017106.

  9. Alsaleh A, Pellino G, Christodoulides N, Malietzis G, Kontovounisios C. Hyponatremia could identify patients with intrabdominal sepsis and anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. 2019;71:17–20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s13304-019-00627-2. Epub February 8 2019. PMID: 30737637.

  10. Giannis D, Matenoglou E, Moris D. Hyponatremia as a marker of complicated appendicitis: A systematic review. Surgeon. 2020 ;18:295–304. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.surge.2020.01.002. Epub February 5 2020. PMID: 32035730.

  11. Zhan W, Deng W, Liu Y, Feng S. Hyponatremia as a predictor of complicated appendicitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2022;45:2009–11. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.04.058. Epub April 27 2022. PMID: 35490069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pogorelić Z, Lukšić B, Ninčević S, Lukšić B, Polašek O. Hyponatremia as a predictor of perforated acute appendicitis in pediatric population: a prospective study. J Pediatr Surg. 2021;56:1816–21. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.066. Epub October 8 2020. PMID: 33153722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Qureshi MU, Iqbal A, Habib M, Nisar MU, Ayub A, Chaudhary MA et al. Hyponatremia as A marker of complicated appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2022 ;34;Suppl 1(4):S974-8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.55519/JAMC-04-S4-9982, PMID: 36550656.

  14. Turhan VB, Ünsal A, Öztürk B, Öztürk D, Buluş H. Predictive value of serum sodium level in determining perforated appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 ;28:290-5. English. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.14744/tjtes.2021.69670, PMID: 35485569.

  15. Heymowski A, Boström L, Dahlberg M. Plasma sodium and age are important markers of risk of perforation in acute appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25:287–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11605-020-04753-w. Epub August 31 2020. PMID: 32865731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Akbulut S, Bahçe ZS, Öztaş T, Gümüş S, Söğütçü N, Sakarya H, Gök AFK, Yağmur Y. Assessment of demographic, clinical and histopathological features of patients who underwent appendectomy due to a presumed diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2021;27(3):315–324. English. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.14744/tjtes.2020.73537. PMID: 33884602.

  17. Sheen J, Bowen J, Whitmore H, Bowling K. Hyponatremia as a marker of complicated appendicitis: A retrospective analysis. Cureus. 2022 8;14:e26672. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.7759/cureus.26672, PMID, PMCID: PMC9357972.

  18. Flum DR. Clinical practice. Acute appendicitis—Appendectomy or the “antibiotics first” strategy. N Engl J Med. 2015 14;372:1937-43. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2015 4;372:1937-43. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1056/NEJMcp1215006, PMID: 25970051.

  19. Gomes CA, Nunes TA, Fonseca Chebli JM, Junior CS, Gomes CC. Laparoscopy grading system of acute appendicitis: New insight for future trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 ;22:463-6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/SLE.0b013e318262edf1, PMID: 23047394.

  20. Kim DY, Nassiri N, de Virgilio C, Ferebee MP, Kaji AH, Hamilton CE et al. Association between hyponatremia and complicated appendicitis. JAMA Surg. 2015 ;150:911-2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1258, PMID: 26222325.

  21. Peksöz R, Dişçi E, Kaya A, Ağırman E, Korkut E, Aksungur N, Altundaş N, Kara S, Atamanalp SS. Significance of laboratory parameters in diagnosing acute appendicitis during pregnancy. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92(1–2):121–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/ans.17443. Epub 2021 Dec 29. PMID: 34967103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Akbulut S, Koç C, Şahin TT, Şahin E, Tuncer A, Demyati K, Şamdancı E, Çolak C, Yılmaz S. An investigation into the factors predicting acute appendicitis and perforated appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2021;27(4):434–442. English. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.14744/tjtes.2020.60344. PMID: 34213000.

  23. Akbulut S, Yagin FH, Cicek IB, Koc C, Colak C, Yilmaz S. Prediction of Perforated and Nonperforated Acute Appendicitis using machine learning-based explainable Artificial Intelligence. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(6):1173. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics13061173. PMID: 36980481; PMCID: PMC10047288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Swart RM, Hoorn EJ, Betjes MG, Zietse R. Hyponatremia and inflammation: The emerging role of interleukin-6 in osmoregulation. Nephron Physiol. 2011;118:45–51. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1159/000322238. Epub December 22 2010. PMID: 21196778.

  25. Käser SA, Furler R, Evequoz DC, Maurer CA. Hyponatremia is a specific marker of perforation in sigmoid diverticulitis or appendicitis in patients older than 50 years. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:462891. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1155/2013/462891. Epub February 13 2013. PMID, PMCID: PMC3586515.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Symeonidis NG, Pavlidis ET, Psarras KK, Stavrati K, Nikolaidou C, Marneri A et al. Preoperative hyponatremia indicates complicated acute appendicitis. Surg Res Pract. 2022;2022:1836754. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1155/2022/1836754, PMID, PMCID: PMC8989617.

  27. Walsh A, Lala S, Wells C, Upadhyay V. Hyponatremia an indicator of complicated appendicitis in children: Starship experience. ANZ J Surg. 2022 ;92:747 – 52. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/ans.17425. Epub December 19 2021. PMID: 34927323.

  28. Ozdemir DB, Karayigit A, Dizen H, Unal B. Role of hyponatremia in differentiating complicated appendicitis from uncomplicated appendicitis: A comparative study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 ;26:8057-63. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.26355/eurrev_202211_30159, PMID: 36394756.

  29. Moris D, Paulson EK, Pappas TN. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults: A review. JAMA. 2021 14;326:2299 – 311. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1001/jama.2021.20502, PMID: 34905026.

  30. Kim HY, Park JH, Lee YJ, Lee SS, Jeon JJ, Lee KH. Systematic review and meta-analysis of CT features for differentiating complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Radiology. 2018 ;287:104 – 15. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1148/radiol.2017171260. Epub November 27 2017. PMID: 29173071.

  31. Pérez-Soto RH, Ponce de León-Ballesteros G, Álvarez-Bautista F, Trolle-Silva AM, Medina-Franco H. Thrombocytosis and hyponatremia as predictors of complicated acute appendicitis: Predictors of appendicitis. J Surg Res. 2021;261:369 – 75. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.050. Epub January 22 2021. PMID: 33493889.

  32. Shuaib A, Alhamdan N, Arian H, Sallam MA, Shuaib A. Hyperbilirubinemia and hyponatremia as predictors of complicated appendicitis. Med Sci (Basel). 2022 4;10:36:35893118. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medsci10030036, PMID, PMCID: PMC9326721.

  33. Loftus TJ, Brakenridge SC, Croft CA, Stephen Smith R, Efron PA, Moore FA, et al. Successful nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis: predictors and outcomes. J Surg Res. 2018;222:212–8. .e2. Epub November 13 2017. PMID, PMCID: PMC5742042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Singh JP, Mariadason JG. Role of the faecolith in modern-day appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95:48–51. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1308/003588413X13511609954851, PMID, PMCID: PMC3964638.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chandrasegaram MD, Rothwell LA, An EI, Miller RJ. Pathologies of the appendix: a 10-year review of 4670 appendicectomy specimens. ANZ J Surg. 2012;82:844–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06185.x. Epub August 24 2012. PMID: 22924871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Arnbjörnsson E, Bengmark S. Obstruction of the appendix lumen in relation to pathogenesis of acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Scand. 1983;149:789–91. PMID: 6666496.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Editage for the English language editing.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Carapicuiba, 95, Pedreira street, Carapicuiba, 06321-665, SP, Brazil

    Bruno Messias, Isabella Cubas, Erica Mocchetti & Tania Ichinose

  2. Medical School, São Camilo University Center, Nazare Avenue, São Paulo, 1501, 04263- 200, SP, Brazil

    Bruno Messias, Caio Oliveira & Flavia Hashimoto

  3. Department of Surgery, ABC Medical School, Lauro Gomes Avenue, Santo André, 2000, 09060-870, SP, Brazil

    Jaques Waisberg

  4. Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City- Mayo Clinic, P. O. Box 11001, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Marcelo A. F. Ribeiro Junior

  5. Catholic University of São Paulo, 290, Joubert Wey Street, Sorocaba, 18030-070, SP, Brazil

    Marcelo A. F. Ribeiro Junior

Authors
  1. Bruno Messias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isabella Cubas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Caio Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Flavia Hashimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Erica Mocchetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tania Ichinose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jaques Waisberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Marcelo A. F. Ribeiro Junior
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BM had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: BM, IC, CO, EM; Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: BM, CO, FH, TI, EM, IC; Drafting of the manuscript: BM; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: MR, JW; Statistical Analysis: BM, EM; Administrative, technical material support: CO, FH; Supervision: MR, JW.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Messias.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of São Camilo University Center (CAAE number: 68182223.2.0000.0062). This study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines of Helsinki declaration, meeting all the requirements for studies in humans. The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study by the Research Ethics Committee of São Camilo University Center.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Messias, B., Cubas, I., Oliveira, C. et al. Usefulness of serum sodium levels as a novel marker for predicting acute appendicitis severity: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg 23, 312 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12893-023-02224-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12893-023-02224-y

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us