Skip to main content
Download PDF

Elevated total and direct bilirubin are associated with acute complicated appendicitis: a single-center based study in Saudi Arabia

BMC Surgery volume 23, Article number: 342 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency and up to our knowledge no previous studies have been conducted in Saudi Arabia particularly at Qassim region and this study aimed to determine a total and direct bilirubin as a predictor of acute complicated appendicitis.

Methods

Observational retrospective study that included patients admitted under the general surgery department with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis at King Saud Hospital, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia. Data on age, gender, BMI, diabetes mellitus, total and direct bilirubin, AST, ALT, sodium, and WBCs levels were obtained.

Result

Among the overall study population of 158 patients, the age median [IQR] was 24.5 [19–31], males were 99 (62.7%), and complicated appendicitis was 33 (20.9%). The multivariable analysis revealed that both elevated total and direct bilirubin are associated with complicated appendicitis (aOR = 3.79, 95% CI: 1.67–8.48, P = 0.001) and (aOR = 4.74, 95% CI: 2.07–10.86, P < 0.001) respectively. A receiver operating characteristic curve showed the best cutoff value of total and direct bilirubin as ≥ 15 µmol/L and ≥ 5 µmol/L respectively, with a sensitivity of 57.6%, and specificity of 73.6% for elevated total bilirubin, and a sensitivity of 54.6%, and specificity of 80% for elevated direct bilirubin.

Conclusion

Elevated total and direct bilirubin are associated with acute complicated appendicitis in this setting. However, it should be supportive factor for acute complicated appendicitis and not considered as standalone diagnostic test.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Acute Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency which is caused by an obstruction of the lumen, and secretion of fluids into the obstructed lumen which may lead to ischemia, complicated by gangrene or abscess, and may further be complicated by peritonitis and perforation [1]. The chances of perforation increase proportionally with delayed presentation and thus the earlier the appendectomy the fewer chances of perforation occurring [2]. A greater frequency is observed during the second through fourth decades of life, but the diagnosis of appendicitis can be made at any age [3]. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis account for less than 5% among children younger than five years old, while about 40% among the age-group between 10 and 29 years [4]. The lifetime risk in the US is 8.6% in males and 6.7% in females and complicated appendicitis was found intra-operatively to be from 16.5 to 24.4% [5]. Detecting acute appendicitis in some patients with atypical clinical presentation is challenging and further investigations are required for early diagnosis [6]. Perforated appendicitis is associated with poor prognosis which increases morbidity and mortality [7]. The perforated appendicitis in adults is observed in 17 to20% of cases [8]. On other hand, patient may have normal appendix and undergo appendectomy which may have potential complications, hospitalization, and costs [9]. A closed loop formed from appendix lumen obstruction, either by mucosal edema or fecolith. Yet, a paper by Sisson et al. demonstrated that before the obstruction happens superficial mucosal ulcers appear earlier in the disease [10, 11]. Usually, the flora of the appendix contains anaerobes in 60% of the cases, with E. coli and Bacteroides fragilis being the most commonly isolated bacteria in appendicitis [12, 13]. Almost 80% of liver blood supply is from the portal venous system, which transfers bacteria and toxins along with absorbed substances from the intestine. Detoxification of toxins and some of the bacteria may fail due to the high load of bacteria in cases of complicated appendicitis, which may lead to hepatocyte damage hence, a rise in serum bilirubin level. Additionally, macrophages release cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1,6 (IL-1,6) which lead to the inhibition of canalicular excretion of conjugated bilirubin [13,14,15]. A variety laboratory tests along with other factors may be used to predict appendicitis and complications such as high bilirubin, CRP, Positive peritoneal signs, fever, and old age [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Total and direct hyperbilirubinemia have been considered as potential biomarkers for acute complicated appendicitis. Bakshi and Mandal found a raised total bilirubin levels among 91.42% of complicated appendicitis cases [22]. In another study by Veeresh Kumar Ireddy et al., 84.21% had elevated bilirubin levels [23]. Sreeramulu et al. also reported that hyperbilirubinemia, particularly with high direct bilirubin levels, may be considered a key marker for predicting gangrene/perforation in appendicitis [24]. To our knowledge, there is no previous study conducted in Saudi Arabia particularly Qassim region, and therefore this is the first study that aimed to assess an association between total and direct bilirubin level and acute complicated appendicitis.

Materials and methods

Study setting

The study was conducted at the general surgery department, King Saud Hospital (KSH) in Qassim region. KSH is the second largest hospital in Qassim region with a capacity of approximately 300 beds [25]. The hospital is situated in Unaizah city, the second largest city in Qassim region, one of Saudi Arabia’s 13 administrative regions with over 1.4 million people [26].

Study design and patient recruitment

Observational retrospective study was conducted at KSH in Qassim region. Medical files of all patients operated for appendicitis in between March 2019 to March 2021were reviewed. All the files of patients aged 14 years and above who had a confirmed appendicitis were reviewed. Patients who were less than 14 years, had missing data, history of cholelithiasis, hepatotoxic drugs, hemolytic or hepatic conditions were excluded. Data on age, gender, BMI, direct and total bilirubin, liver function tests (LFTs), Sodium, and WBC, and intraoperative findings were extracted. After extracting the data using a checklist by one author, another author reviewed the data to ensure the validation.

Definitions and measurements

The patients were classified according to complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis based on radiological image or gross appearance intra-operatively. Complicated appendicitis includes perforated appendix and/or periappndicular abscess formation while uncomplicated include the Presence of inflammation in the appendix without perforation or abscess formation. The unit of measurement of the total and direct bilirubin was uMol/L and reference range for normal total and direct bilirubin was 5.1–17 uMol/L and 1.7–5.1 uMol/L respectively. However, elevated total and direct bilirubin were ≥ 15 µmol/L and ≥ 5 µmol/L, respectively according to `the optimal cutoff points. The unit of Aspartate transaminase (AST) and Alanine transaminase (ALT) was IU/L, and white blood cells (WBCs) was 109/L.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using STATA version 17. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test if continues variables follows a normal distribution. The mean and standard deviation (SD) were presented for continuous data that were normally distributed and the median and interquartile ranges [IQRs] for that were not normally distributed. Variables with p value < 0.20 in bivariate analysis were included in multivariable analysis. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors associated with complicated appendicitis. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was performed and the optimal cut-off points, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were reported. Furthermore, simple linear analysis was performed to determine total and direct bilirubin as dependent continues variables and complicated appendicitis as independent variable. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CIs) were reported. A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

Results

A total of 158 patients were included in the study with a median [IQR] age of 24.5 [19–31] years, ranged from 14 to 71 years, and 99 (62.7%) were male. Regarding gross appearance intra-operatively, 33 (20.9%) had complicated appendicitis. The median of total and direct bilirubin was higher among complicated appendicitis and was statistically significant, also elevated total and direct bilirubin was statistically significant, while the following variables; age, BMI, AST, ALT, WBCs, sodium, gender, diabetes mellitus were not statistically significant, detailed in (Table 1). In multivariable analysis, elevated total and direct bilirubin association remained statistically significant for complicated appendicitis (aOR = 3.79, 95% CI: 1.67–8.48, P = 0.001) and (aOR = 4.74, 95% CI: 2.07–10.86, P < 0.001), respectively, detailed in (Table 2). A simple linear regression showed a positive association between total and direct bilirubin with complicated appendicitis (beta coefficient = 11.86, 95% CI: 7.33–16.38, P < 0.001) and (beta coefficient = 3.59, 95% CI: 2.01–5.18, P < 0.001) respectively, detailed in (Table 3). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPP, and AUC of elevated total bilirubin were 57.6%, 73.6%, 36.5%, 86.8%, and 69% respectively and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPP, and AUC of elevated direct bilirubin were 54.6%, 80%, 41.9%, 86.9%, and 72%, respectively, detailed in (Table 4).

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population and comparison between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis (n = 158)
Full size table
Table 2 Multivariable analyses of predictors associated with acute complicated appendicitis among the participants
Full size table
Table 3 Simple linear regression for total and direct bilirubin associated with complicated appendicitis
Full size table
Table 4 Diagnostic efficacy for elevated total and direct bilirubin
Full size table

Discussion

In this study of hospitalized subjects, 20.9% had complicated appendicitis. Upon comparing two studies conducted on same objectives in the years 2017 and 2018, it can be inferred that our finding is in agreement with a retrospective cohort study by Serres SK et al. (2017), Which demonstrated a complication rate of 23%, but much lesser than the rate of 67.7% reported by Valon A. Zejnullahu et al., among the patients with acute appendicitis [27, 28]. The authors identified delayed referral by primary care centers and limited access to the medical services as possible reasons behind the higher rate of complicated cases in aforementioned study [28]. Complicated appendicitis may lead to worse outcomes, and its preoperative identification has a profound impact on timing of surgery [29]. Recent advances in ultrasonography and CT have reduced the rate of negative outcomes by assisting in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The diagnostic significance of sonography with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 92% for acute appendicitis has been widely acknowledged, particularly for pregnant ladies and pediatric patients [30, 31]. Furthermore, the helical CT is proven to be more efficient in terms of accuracy than sonography, with sensitivities ranging from 90 to 99% and specificities ranging from 91 to 99% [32,33,34]. However, Pritchett et al. has recently demonstrated that the utilization of CT scan for diagnosis of acute appendicitis not only results in the increased healthcare cost and a prolonged stay in the emergency department, but also leads to delay in the surgical procedure [35]. Taken that into account, physical examinations and laboratory tests are still of fundamental importance in the diagnostic process [36]. Numerous studies have analyzed the role of elevated bilirubin as a laboratory marker in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Recently, some researches have also attempted to investigate a possible link between elevated bilirubin and acute complicated appendicitis [27, 45,46,47,48,49,50]. Based on our investigation, the findings are association of elevated total and direct bilirubin with acute complicated appendicitis. Similar findings were reported by studies conducted by Valon, A et al., Motie MR et al., and Chaudhary et al., that high levels of serum total bilirubin and direct bilirubin were observed in the patients afflicted with complicated appendicitis [27, 51, 52]. Our observations also coincide with several other past studies which also demonstrated a significant association in this regard [27, 38, 45, 53,54,55]. Elevated bilirubin in cases of appendicitis occurs due to bacteraemia or endotoxaemia, which may be seen in both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, though the latter is more commonly associated with this phenomenon [56,57,58]. We also evaluated sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPP of elevated total and direct bilirubin, and found a low sensitivity (total = 57.6%, and direct = 54.6%) and high specificity (total = 73.6%, and direct = 80%) with positive and negative predictive values of 36.5%, and 41.9% for total and 86.8%, and 86.9% for direct elevated bilirubin respectively. Our findings are in agreement with a meta-analysis which also demonstrated a low sensitivity of 49% and a specificity of 82% [41]. Regarding the diagnostic efficiency of elevated bilirubin, our results differ considerably from other studies. Valon A and colleagues showed the sensitivity of total bilirubin as 54.4%, specificity at 72.3%, positive predictive value at 80.4%, and negative predictive value at 43.1% for complicated appendicitis [27]. A prospective study by Chaudhary et al., exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 92.9%, respectively, in gangrenous appendicitis, with high positive and negative predictive values of 72.7% and 100%, respectively [52]. Shuaib A et al., observed in a retrospective single-center study a sensitivity of 65.5% and specificity of 75.4%, while PPV and NPV were 28.4%, and 93.6% respectively [59]. The report by Khan and colleagues revealed an 88% sensitivity and 80% specificity in predicting the occurrence of perforative appendicitis [60]. Moreover, D’Souza et al. have proposed in a study that patients with acute appendicitis and complicated appendicitis cases have exhibited high specificity in hyperbilirubinemia [39]. Studies by Beltran MA et al.,. and Panagiotopoulou I et al., concluded showing no diagnostic value of hyperbilirubinemia in the prediction of perforated appendicitis [61, 62]. Looking at the role of the personal preoperative parameters revealed that median age of participants with complicated appendicitis in our study was 30 [18–39], which is in line with the average age of 30.7 years reported in the study conducted in Kosovo [28]. Our study participants were predominantly male like previous studies [45, 46]. However, we didn’t find any association of age and gender with acute complicated appendicitis unlike the previous studies which indicated a significant relationship between old age and male gender, and acute complicated appendicitis [28, 45, 63]. In the current study, multivariate analysis demonstrated no significant association of elevated WBC with acute complicated appendicitis, in contrast to the study conducted in Turkey [45]. However, earlier studies have also revealed that significance of an elevated count of white blood cells (WBC) as predictor of perforated appendicitis is low, and it cannot be considered as specific for appendicitis [37, 38, 47]. Leukocytosis and shift to the left, which were once believed to be an essential laboratory diagnosing criteria for appendicitis with high sensitivity as per Alvarado scoring, are no longer applicable [54, 64]. Our data showed no association of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) with acute complicated appendicitis. Previous reports about the significance of ALT and AST in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and prediction of perforated appendicitis are very limited and inconclusive [52, 65]. We found no association between BMI and acute complicated appendicitis. No previous studies in our literature review revealed any such association except one study by Ozkan A et al., which reported that in patients with a high BMI (more than 30), the rate of diagnosis of acute appendicitis was delayed and identification of perforated appendicitis was significantly higher as compared to their normal or low BMI counterparts. The authors believed that the possible reason behind delayed diagnosis could be excessive subcutaneous adipose tissue which may diminish the physical examination and imaging methods’ sensitivity [63]. Our study found no association between sodium level and acute complicated appendicitis. However, there is a significant evidence of strong association between hyponatremia and increased risk of complicated appendicitis in literature [29, 59, 66, 67]. The possible reason behind our finding maybe due to the fact that majority our study participants were adults and hyponatremia is found to be more strongly associated with complicated appendicitis among pediatric patients but this partially diminishes in older patient cohorts [68]. Our data do not support the use of elevated total and direct bilirubin as a discrete diagnostic marker of complicated appendicitis. Nonetheless, it would be of more significance as a marker when combined with other diagnostic markers [41, 62]. These diagnostic biomarkers usually have high specificity but low sensitivity, therefore when they are applied in combination, specificity increases but sensitivity remains low [51]. Therefore, patient’s clinical presentation and symptomatic history should be used to support these bio markers rather than determining differentials. Additional studies are required to carry out a thorough analysis of the role of elevated total and direct bilirubin as a plausible diagnostic indicator for acute complicated appendicitis in every age range. While clinical diagnosis at emergency department (ED) in our setting categorized 10 cases as complicated appendicitis, yet only 2 cases had complicated appendicitis. However, elevated total and direct bilirubin were already found in 19 (57%) and 18 (54%) cases, respectively out of 33 as final diagnoses. This may indicate that total and direct bilirubin may help in predicting complicated appendicitis at ED settings in suburban area. The current findings of clinical diagnosis are limited by small number of clinically suspected cases as complicated appendicitis and larger study is required. There are some limitations of current study. The sample size was small which limits the power of the study, and there are inherent limitations of this study due to the retrospective method in a single hospital.

Conclusions

Elevated total and direct bilirubin are associated with acute complicated appendicitis in this setting. However, it should be supportive factor for acute complicated appendicitis and not considered as standalone diagnostic test.

Data Availability

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. D’Souza N, Nugent K, Appendicitis. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(2):142–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kulvatunyou N, Zimmerman SA, Joseph B, Friese RS, Gries L, O’Keeffe T, et al. Risk factors for perforated Appendicitis in the Acute Care Surgery era—minimizing the patient’s delayed presentation factor. J Surg Res. 2019;238:113–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Graham JM, Pokorny WJ, Harberg FJ. Acute Appendicitis in preschool age children. Am J Surg. 1980;139(2):247–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz SI, Brunicardi FC. Schwartz’s principles of surgery. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division; 2010. xxi, 1866 p. p.

  5. Appendicitis - StatPearls. - NCBI Bookshelf. [cited 2022 Oct 14]. Available from: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/books/NBK493193/.

  6. De la Quiroga T, Padilla AEFJB, Morales LA. Garza. “How do we approach an adult patient with suspected acute appendicitis?“ Medicina universitaria 18.71 (2016): 125–129.

  7. Flum DR. Acute Appendicitis—appendectomy or the antibiotics first strategy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1937–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP. Has misdiagnosis of Appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA. 2001;286(14):1748–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu Y, Friedlander S, Lee SL. Negative appendectomy: clinical and economic implications. Am Surg. 2016;82(10):1018–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sisson RG, Ahlvin RC, Harlow MC. Superficial mucosal ulceration and the pathogenesis of acute Appendicitis. Am J Surg. 1971;122(3):378–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Raahave D, Christensen E, Moeller H, Kirkeby LT, Loud FB, Knudsen LL. Origin of acute Appendicitis: fecal retention in colonic reservoirs: a case control study. Surg Infect. 2007;8(1):55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Swidsinski A, Dörffel Y, Loening-Baucke V, Theissig F, Rückert JC, Ismail M, et al. Acute Appendicitis is characterised by local invasion with Fusobacterium nucleatum/necrophorum. Gut. 2011;60(1):34–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bennion RS, Baron EJ, Thompson JE Jr, Downes JU, Summanen PA, Talan DA, et al. The bacteriology of gangrenous and perforated Appendicitis–revisited. Ann Surg. 1990;211(2):165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ding Y, Zhao L, Mei H, Huang ZH, Zhang SL. Alterations of biliary biochemical constituents and cytokines in infantile hepatitis syndrome. World J Gastroenterology: WJG. 2006;12(43):7038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang PI, Ayala AL, Ba ZF, Zhou MI, Perrin MM, Chaudry IH. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha produces hepatocellular dysfunction despite normal cardiac output and hepatic microcirculation. Am J Physiology-Gastrointestinal Liver Physiol. 1993;265(1):G126–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Imaoka Y, Itamoto T, Takakura Y, Suzuki T, Ikeda S, Urushihara T. Validity of predictive factors of acute complicated Appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang J, Liu C, He Y, Cai Z. Laboratory markers in the prediction of Acute Perforated Appendicitis in Children. Emerg Med Int. 2019;2019:1–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Akai M, Iwakawa K, Yasui Y, Yoshida Y, Kato T, Kitada K, et al. Hyperbilirubinemia as a predictor of severity of acute Appendicitis. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(8):3663–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Küçükakçali Z, Akbulut S, Çolak C. Value of fecal calprotectin in prediction of acute Appendicitis based on a proposed model of machine learning. Ulus Travma Emergency Surgery Journal. 2023;29(6):655–62.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Akbulut S, Koc C, Kocaaslan H, Gonultas F, Samdanci E, Yologlu S, Yilmaz S. Comparison of clinical and histopathological features of patients who underwent incidental or emergency appendectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;11(1):19–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Akbulut S, Yagin FH, Cicek IB, Koc C, Colak C, Yilmaz S. Prediction of Perforated and Nonperforated Acute Appendicitis using machine learning-based explainable Artificial Intelligence. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(6):1173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bakshi S, Mandal N. Evaluation of role of hyperbilirubinemia as a new diagnostic marker of complicated Appendicitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021;21:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Veeresh, Kumar I, Varun H, Kasyap., Chandan S. Bhoomkar. Hyperbilirubinemia as an indicator in perforated Appendicitis. Int J Sci Res, (2021).

  24. Sreeramulu PN, Shashidhar K, Dr. N, Varsha A. The utility of serum bilirubin as a marker in acute abdomen. Int J Sci Res, (2021).16–7.

  25. Statistical Yearbook. - Statistical Yearbook. [cited 2022 Oct 14]. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/book/Pages/default.aspx.

  26. Population. In Al-Qaseem region by gender, age group, and nationality (Saudi/Non-Saudi) | General Authority for Statistics. [cited 2022 Oct 14]. Available from: https://www.stats.gov.sa/en/5725.

  27. Valon A, Zejnullahu., Rozalinda I, Besnik B, Vjosa A, Zejnullahu., Astrit R. Hamza., Viktoria, Caloska, Ivanova. The diagnostic role of Hyperbilirubinemia in complicated and non -complicated Appendicitis. (2018).;2(2):151–62. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.32391/AJTES.V2I2.14.

  28. Serres SK, Cameron DB, Glass CC, Graham DA, Zurakowski D, Karki M, et al. Time to appendectomy and risk of complicated Appendicitis and adverse outcomes in children. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(8):740–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim DY, Nassiri N, de Virgilio C, et al. Association between Hyponatremia and complicated Appendicitis. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(9):911–2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Orr RK, Porter D, Hartman D. Ultrasonography to evaluate adults for Appendicitis: decision making based on meta-analysis and probabilistic reasoning. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2:644–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM, Warnock N, Berbaum KS. Sonography of acute Appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging. 1995;20:149–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cakirer S, Basak M, Colakoglu B, Bankaoglu M. Diagnosis of acute Appendicitis with unenhanced helical CT: a study of 130 patients. Emerg Radiol. 2002;9:155–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS. Suspected acute Appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology. 1999;213:341–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schuler JG, Shortsleeve MJ, Goldenson RS, Perez-Rossello JM, Perlmutter RA, Thorsen A. Is there a role for abdominal computed tomographic scans in Appendicitis? Arch Surg. 1998;133:373–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pritchett CV, Levinsky NC, Ha YP, Dembe AE, Steinberg SM. Management of acute Appendicitis: the impact of CT scanning on the bottom line. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:699–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kalliakmanis V, Pikoulis E, Karavokyros IG, Felekouras E, Morfaki P, Haralambopoulou G, et al. Acute Appendicitis: the reliability of diagnosis by clinical assessment alone. Scand J Surg. 2005;94:201–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hong YR, Chung CW, Kim JW, Kwon CI, Ahn DH, Kwon SW, Kim SK. Hyperbilirubinemia is a significant indicator for the severity of acute Appendicitis. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Emmanuel A, Murchan P, Wilson I, Balfe P. The value of hyperbilirubinaemia in the diagnosis of acute Appendicitis. The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2011;93(3):213–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. D’Souza N, Karim D, Sunthareswaran R. Bilirubin; a diagnostic marker for Appendicitis. Int J Surg. 2013;11(10):1114–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Estrada JJ, Petrosyan M, Barnhart J, Tao M, Sohn H, Towfigh S, et al. Hyperbilirubinemia in Appendicitis: a new predictor of perforation. J Gastrointest Surgery: Official J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2007;11(6):714–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Giordano S, Pääkkönen M, Salminen P, Grönroos JM. Elevated serum bilirubin in assessing the likelihood of perforation in acute Appendicitis: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2013;11(9):795–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Patel D, Shah NJ, Patel B, Parikh M, Patel D, Dalal C. Evaluation of hyperbilirubinemia as a new diagnostic marker for acute Appendicitis and its role in the prediction of complicated Appendicitis. Int J Res Med. 2014;3(3):28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Akbulut S, Bahçe ZS, Öztaş T, Gümüş S, Söğütçü N, Sakarya H, Gök AFK, Yağmur Y. Assessment of demographic, clinical and histopathological features of patients who suffered appendectomy due to a presumed diagnosis of acute Appendicitis. Ulus Travma Emergency Surgery Journal. 2021;27(3):315–24.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Koç C, Akbulut S, Coşkun EI, Sarıcı B, Yılmaz S. Comparison of the demographic and clinical features of pregnant and non-pregnant patients undergoing appendectomy. Ulus Travma Emergency Surgery Journal. 2020;26(4):555–62.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Atahan K, Üreyen O, Aslan E, Deniz M, Çökmez A, Gür S, et al. Preoperative diagnostic role of hyperbilirubinaemia as a marker of appendix perforation. J Int Med Res. 2011;39:609–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jamaluddin M, Hussain SM, Ahmad H. Hyperbilirubinaemia a predictive factor for complicated acute Appendicitis: a study in a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(11):1374–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Keskek M, Tez M, Yoldas O, Acar A, Akgul O, Gocmen E, et al. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of leukocyte counts in operations for suspected Appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(7):769–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Adams HL, Jaunoo SS. Hyperbilirubinaemia in Appendicitis: the diagnostic value for prediction of Appendicitis and appendiceal perforation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42:249–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Silva FR, da Rosa MI, Silva BR, Simon C, Alexandre MC, Medeiros LR, et al. Hyperbilirubinaemia alone cannot distinguish a perforation in acute Appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86(4):255–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jaskani S, Al-Hamid Z, Chattopadhyay D. 896 can we count on serum hyperbilirubinemia to Predict Acute Complicated Appendicitis? Br J Surg. 2021;108(Supplement6):znab259–524.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Motie MR, Nik MM, Gharaee M. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of serum level of total bilirubin in patients with suspected acute Appendicitis. Electron Physician. 2017;9(4):4048–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Chaudhary P, Kumar A, Saxena N, Biswal UC. Hyperbilirubinemia as a predictor of gangrenous/perforated Appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann Gastroenterol. 2013;26(4):325–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Vaziri M, Pazouki A, Tamannaie Z, Maghsoudloo F, Pishgahroudsari M, Chaichian S. Comparison of pre-operative bilirubin level in simple Appendicitis and perforated Appendicitis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2013;27(3):109–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Socea B, Carâp A, Rac-Albu M, Constantin V. The value of serum bilirubin level and of white blood cell count as severity markers for acute Appendicitis. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013;108(6):829–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Khan S. Elevated serum bilirubin in acute Appendicitis: a new diagnostic tool. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2008;6(2):161–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Whiting JF, Green RM, Rosenbluth AB, Gollan JL. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha decreases hepatocyte bile salt uptake and mediates endotoxin-induced cholestasis. Hepatology. 1995;22:1273–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Brook I. Bacterial studies of peritoneal cavity and postoperative surgical wound drainage following perforated appendix in children. Ann Surg. 1980;192:208–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Baron EJ, Baron R, et al. A microbial comparison between acute and complicated Appendicitis. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:227–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Shuaib A, Alhamdan N, Arian H, Sallam MA, Shuaib A. Hyperbilirubinemia and Hyponatremia as predictors of complicated Appendicitis. Med Sci (Basel). 2022;10(3):36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Khan AQ, Patil A, Pawar P. Role of hyperbilirubinemia as a diagnostic predictor of appendicular perforation. Int J Sci Res. 2014;3(12):2012–5.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Beltran MA, Mendez PE, Barrera RE, Contreras MA, Wilson CS, Cortes VJ, et al. Is hyperbilirubinaemia in Appendicitis a better predictor of perforation than C-reactive protein? - a prospective study. Indian J Surg. 2009;71(5):265–72. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s12262-009-0074-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Panagiotopoulou I, Parashar D, Lin R, Antonowicz S, Wells AD, Bajwa FM, et al. The diagnostic value of white cell count, C-reactive protein and bilirubin in acute Appendicitis and its Complications. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(3):215–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Ozkan A, Gokce AH, Gokce FS. The importance of laboratory tests and body Mass Index in the diagnosis of acute Appendicitis. Pol J Surg. 2020;92(6):7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Birchley D. Patients with clinical acute Appendicitis should have pre-operative full blood count and C-reactive protein assays. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88(1):27–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Farooqui W, Pommergaard HC, Burcharth J, Eriksen JR. The diagnostic value of a panel of serological markers in acute Appendicitis. Scand J Surg. 2015;104(2):72–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Käser SA, Furler R, Evequoz DC. Hyponatremia is a specific marker of perforation in sigmoid diverticulitis or Appendicitis in patients older than 50 years. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:462891.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Pham XD, Sullins VF, Kim DY. Factors predictive of complicated Appendicitis in children. J Surg Res. 2016;206:62–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Poston LM, Leavitt T, Pope S, Hill H, Tollinche LE, Kaelber DC, Alter JA. Pre-appendectomy hyponatremia is associated with increased rates of complicated Appendicitis. Surg Open Sci. 2023;13:88–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, Qassim University for funding publication of this project.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia

    Mohammed S. Alfehaid

  2. King Saud Hospital, Ministry of Health, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia

    Ayman M. Babiker, Hanan Abdalla Sinyan, Bshayr K. Alkhalaf & Rakan Alshuwaykan

  3. Research unit, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia

    Abdullah Hamad Alkharraz, Hamad yousef Alsaeed, Ali Abdullah Alzunaydi & Adi Abdulaziz Aldubaiyan

  4. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia

    Rehana Khalil & Osama Al-Wutayd

Authors
  1. Mohammed S. Alfehaid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ayman M. Babiker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdullah Hamad Alkharraz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hamad yousef Alsaeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ali Abdullah Alzunaydi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Adi Abdulaziz Aldubaiyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hanan Abdalla Sinyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bshayr K. Alkhalaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Rakan Alshuwaykan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Rehana Khalil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Osama Al-Wutayd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization; Alfehaid, Babiker, alkharraz, Al-Wutayd. Methodology; Alsaeed, alzynaydi, aldubaiyan, Sinyan. Data collection; Alkhalaf. Alshuwaykan, aldubaiyan Investigation; Babiker, Sinyan, Alkhalaf, Alshuwaykan. Supervision; Alfehaid, alkharraz, Alsaeed. Writing—review and editing; Al-Wutayd, Khalil, Alfehaid. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osama Al-Wutayd.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Institutional Review Board of Regional Research Ethics Committee, Qassim province (reference No. 14421868149). The need for written informed consent was waived by Qassim Regional Research Ethics Committee due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alfehaid, M.S., Babiker, A.M., Alkharraz, A.H. et al. Elevated total and direct bilirubin are associated with acute complicated appendicitis: a single-center based study in Saudi Arabia. BMC Surg 23, 342 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12893-023-02258-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12893-023-02258-2

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us